[PDF] Behold a Pale Horse Summary - Milton William Cooper (2025)

(continued)...

The book includes substantiated claims from a range of informants embedded in the intelligence sector to bolster the author's arguments. He uses their testimony to bolster his argument that a shadow government exists, capable of overriding even presidential authority. This alleged coup serves as a powerful example of the lengths to which the conspirators will go to maintain secrecy and control.

Documented accounts and proof confirm the involvement of the CIA in covert operations and the illicit drug trade.

Cooper alleges that the CIA participates in unlawful narcotics trafficking and carries out covert operations, with the proceeds being used to finance their undercover missions and advance their objective of creating a worldwide governing structure. He references particular instances such as the dispute regarding arms transactions and the monetary backing of Nicaraguan rebels, along with alleged drug trafficking activities linked to the Panamanian leader, offering documentation and proof to back up his claims.

Cooper argues that the CIA established a complex system using front companies and secret transportation methods to bring illicit drugs into the United States. He presents evidence suggesting that figures like George Bush, occupying the upper echelons of political authority, participated in these actions. Cooper views the CIA's engagement in the drug trade as a flagrant example of the way those in power disregard both the law and human lives to achieve their objectives.

A thorough analysis of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 reveals aspects designed to erode personal liberties and lay the groundwork for a totalitarian government.

Cooper examines the 1988 law, arguing that it contains provisions intended to erode constitutional protections and establish the groundwork for a totalitarian regime, all under the guise of addressing substance misuse. He details a variety of troubling aspects of the law, highlighting how it sanctions warrantless searches, curtails freedom of expression, expands governmental surveillance, and permits federal agencies to exceed their customary legal boundaries.

Cooper argues that, although the legislation seems intended to address drug addiction, it is in reality a covert strategy to augment the government's control over the populace. He urges people to carefully examine the language of these statutes, recognizing the subtle ways through which personal liberties are incrementally eroded under the guise of protecting the country and maintaining public security.

It is claimed that clandestine organizations and powerful collectives are scheming to undermine the foundational principles and independence of the United States.

Cooper suggests that the supposed conspiracy, which targets the undermining of the United States' sovereignty and the Constitution's sanctity, is primarily carried out by secret societies, powerful groups, and particular government bodies. He portrays these entities as a group of interconnected organizations working together to infiltrate institutions and wield control over public opinion and the shaping of government policies.

Conspiracies often stem from secretive organizations that wield power by infiltrating and altering the workings of established institutions.

Cooper posits that clandestine entities form the core of the conspiracy, infiltrating traditional institutions to manipulate their actions internally. He argues that these organizations are not simply benign fraternities but wield significant influence, using their widespread networks to advance their agendas and ensure loyalty to their core tenets.

The ancient Illuminati is often considered the forerunner of modern secret societies such as the Freemasons, Skull and Bones, Scroll and Key, as well as the Society of Jesus.

Cooper points to an ancient and clandestine organization as the power propelling contemporary clandestine societies. He emphasizes the pervasive control of the Illuminati, which encompasses various organizations, such as the Society of Jesus. He contends that these societies have similar objectives, ceremonies, and esoteric foundations, and are covertly striving to create a global governance they can dominate.

The book explores the connections between secretive groups and the "omniscient eye," emphasizing its association with Luciferian doctrines and secret rituals.

Cooper deciphers the symbol of a triangle enclosing an eye as a significant emblem that reveals the covert commitment to Luciferian and esoteric ceremonies by particular clandestine groups. He argues that the emblem of an eye surrounded by a pyramid signifies an overarching authority watching over humanity, emblematic of their quest for complete control.

Cooper delves into the history and symbolic meaning of the all-seeing eye, tracking its origins back to the ancient mystical knowledge centers in Babylon and Egypt. He argues that the presence of Masonic symbols in the design of U.S. currency is a deliberate move to promote a Luciferian agenda. He perceives this symbolism as an affront to conventional Christian principles, emphasizing the conspiracy's arcane essence.

Various powerful groups and government entities act as instruments to carry out the conspiracy's goals.

Cooper views specific individuals in the government as agents carrying out the secret goals of these privileged groups. He argues that clandestine groups have infiltrated these institutions, manipulating their strategies and commandeering their resources to facilitate the creation of a single worldwide governance.

Individuals affiliated with the Illuminati, through their influence on crucial decision-making bodies, guide the course of America's international relations and promote the concept of global governance by occupying influential positions in major institutions focused on global relations and economic collaboration.

Milton William Cooper contends that appointed entities like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission are under the sway of the Illuminati, who manipulate policy decisions. He asserts that such entities have infiltrated the highest levels of government, using their influence to shape the foreign policy of the United States and further their objective of global domination.

A group of experts known as the JASON scientists, who hold the highest level of security clearances, wield significant power over critical national security decisions.

Cooper portrays the JASON scholars as a mysterious group of elite scientists wielding significant influence over crucial decisions affecting the safety and defense of the nation. He argues that the clandestine nature of these organizations, along with their exclusive access to classified data, allows them to steer technological advancement and national security strategy to further the goals of the purported conspiracy.

In the event of a manufactured national crisis, FEMA has the authority to impose martial law and suspend constitutional rights.

Cooper posits that the primary organization designated to enforce martial law, thereby suspending the operation of the United States Constitution, is the Federal Emergency Management Agency. He argues that FEMA has the infrastructure and authority to take over governance at all tiers, implement population control measures, and establish a dictatorial regime under the guise of reacting to national emergencies.

Cooper elaborates on the extensive authority granted to FEMA by Executive Order 11490, which includes taking over the responsibilities of municipal, state, and national authorities during times of declared crises. He emphasizes that fabricated crises, like acts of terrorism or economic recessions, might be used as justifications to initiate the extraordinary powers endowed to the agency responsible for managing federal emergencies. He contends that the increasingly influential role of FEMA unmistakably indicates a purposeful move towards autocratic governance.

Government actions and legal strategies were intentionally crafted to erode individual liberties, setting the stage for a totalitarian government marked by pervasive monitoring and dominance by police forces.

Cooper argues that there is a continuous and intentional erosion of the protections afforded by the Constitution, which is setting the stage for the establishment of an authoritarian government through specific legislative and legal measures. He contends that those orchestrating the conspiracy are systematically eroding individual liberties while simultaneously enhancing the power of the executive branch through various legislative measures and executive orders, thus skewing the scales of justice to align with their goals.

The executive branch's power has been expanded through presidential directives that reduce the protections provided by the Constitution.

Cooper highlights how various laws and executive orders gradually undermine constitutional protections while simultaneously enhancing the power of the presidency. He examines the possible consequences of these directives, revealing the ways in which they might be twisted to erode individual liberties and increase the power of a centralized governing body.

The legislation enacted in 1988, frequently referred to as the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, introduced provisions that permitted warrantless searches, restricted freedom of expression, and resulted in the establishment of a national law enforcement body.

Cooper scrutinizes the 1988 legislation, highlighting how it allows for warrantless searches, curtails freedom of speech, and establishes a national law enforcement body ostensibly to fight against drug addiction. He argues that the initial proposal to permit the use of unlawfully obtained evidence in narcotics cases, though seemingly rejected, set a dangerous precedent, signaling a deliberate attempt to undermine the safeguards provided by the Fourth Amendment. He also suggests that the implementation of Section 6293, which allows for the handling of federal drug-related offenses through alternative methods not aligned with the established criminal justice system, indicates an intention to create a separate court system devoid of the constitutional safeguards, characteristic of an authoritarian regime. He further references the legislation's stipulation for an international financial regulatory system, necessitating the revelation of significant cash transactions and endowing the chief financial officer of the United States with extensive authority to examine financial records, indicative of a move to control the flow of money and consolidate economic control. Cooper contends that such occurrences signal an intentional distortion of the legislative process, aimed at diminishing individual liberties while ostensibly safeguarding the populace.

Should a "national emergency" of an unclear nature occur, the powers conferred upon the Federal Emergency Management Agency might lead to a diminution of constitutional safeguards, thereby allowing for an increase in government power.

Cooper perceives Executive Order 11490 as a troubling example of how executive orders might bypass constitutional limitations and facilitate an autocratic takeover. He emphasizes that the terminology used by the Order, which is intended to cover "any conceivable emergency," grants FEMA expansive authority to override constitutional rule in virtually any scenario deemed a national emergency by the president. He further underscores the absence of a prescribed mechanism within the Order or any related documents for reinstating constitutional governance after the emergency's conclusion, hinting at a deliberate omission indicative of an enduring departure from adherence to constitutional norms.

Milton William Cooper conveyed his concerns about the potential for abuse due to the broad wording found in the directive known as Executive Order 11490. He is wary that a fabricated or exaggerated crisis could lead to the activation of exceptional powers by the national agency responsible for handling emergencies, which might result in the permanent suspension of constitutional rights and the establishment of a dictatorial government. He is driven by his concerns to alert the populace to recognize and resist the increasing influence of FEMA.

The United States' sovereignty was perceived to be undermined by the pivotal legal measures taken in 1945 concerning its alliance with the United Nations.

Cooper views the 1945 legislation that connects the United States to the United Nations as a tool designed for global cooperation, which he believes was subtly intended to diminish the sovereignty of the United States and lay the groundwork for global governance. He argues that the agreement's terms gradually enhance the authority of United Nations resolutions above that of the United States Constitution, thus enabling a transfer of judicial authority from domestic institutions to international bodies.

The pact places United Nations mandates at a higher level of authority, surpassing that of the U.S. Constitution's sovereignty.

Cooper argues that the architects behind the UN Treaty skillfully exploited a clause within the U.S. Constitution, particularly Article VI, which stipulates that treaties ratified by the country shall be regarded as the highest form of legal authority. He emphasizes that in consenting to adhere to Article 25 of the UN Charter, the United States has, in effect, surrendered a measure of its sovereign power, committing to enact the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the core tenets of the institution.

Cooper argues that the supremacy of U.S. constitutional law is compromised by international directives, particularly those stemming from collaborative legislative actions with the UN, which have the potential to be enforced regardless of explicit consent from the United States, thus relegating it to a subordinate role compared to global legal structures. He views this legal maneuver as a pivotal step that compromises the sovereignty of the United States and sets the stage for the creation of a worldwide governing structure.

The "Uniting for Peace" resolution led to an expansion of the General Assembly's powers, enabling the creation of international rules even without the involvement of the US government.

Cooper underscores the profound influence that the UN General Assembly's 1950 "UNITING FOR PEACE" resolution exerted in diminishing the independent power of the United States. He argues that this action granted a separate body powers that are usually reserved for the Security Council, circumventing the veto power of the United States within this council.

Cooper contends that a series of international directives, despite lacking General Assembly approval and subsequently receiving only a modest majority's support, have the power to supersede domestic laws in the United States. He argues that a variety of actions, authorized under the framework of the U.N. Participation Act, are setting the stage for the implementation of international law within the United States, bypassing the nation's traditional lawmaking processes. The author contends that a conglomerate of international entities is exerting influence over the United States' political framework to further a goal of global unification.

[PDF] Behold a Pale Horse Summary - Milton William Cooper (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Velia Krajcik

Last Updated:

Views: 6104

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Velia Krajcik

Birthday: 1996-07-27

Address: 520 Balistreri Mount, South Armand, OR 60528

Phone: +466880739437

Job: Future Retail Associate

Hobby: Polo, Scouting, Worldbuilding, Cosplaying, Photography, Rowing, Nordic skating

Introduction: My name is Velia Krajcik, I am a handsome, clean, lucky, gleaming, magnificent, proud, glorious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.